Thursday, February 28, 2019

Memes Are Our Generation's Protest Art

Think of “protest art” and you likely imagine certain cliches from a previous era: Hippies gathered around an acoustic guitar, John Lennon and Yoko Ono camping out in their bedroom for weeks.

But today, a new medium of protest art is reigning: memes. Simple to make and simpler to distribute, they can communicate a stance or message at a glance and express the same feelings experts say are behind conventional protest art. There’s even an emerging genre within the landscape experts are calling “activist memes.”

“They’ve become a space for battling and resistance,” Benjamin Burroughs, assistant professor of emerging media at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, told VICE. “The ability for the meme to empower and push back can be really powerful. They’re definitely sites of resistance against perceptions of abuse of power. They spread so quickly and evolve and transform, and it’s hard to shut them down in the way other forms of communicative protest can be silenced.”

Under Donald Trump specifically, Burroughs says, memes have grown in popularity as a way to express political opinions, similar to how George W. Bush’s presidency gave rise to liberal blogs. Most are rooted either in expressing anger, mocking Trump, or collectively coping with the absurdity and even trauma of his presidency. Other memes defend the president, or at least train fire on his detractors, teasing them for being triggered or crying great gobs of liberal tears: Sharing memes that go to bat for his dad is one of the primary ways Don Jr. spends his days.

But when it comes to the anti-Trump memes at least, what shines through—beyond the sense of play—is indignation, the amusement of ridiculing powerful figures, and the comfort that comes from collective coping. Examples of the former include the spoofs on Melania Trump’s infamous “I really don’t care, do u?” jacket and the channeling of the “Arthur’s fist” meme to rally against sexism. Anti-Trump folks turn to memes like Barack Obama and Joe Biden pranking Trump’s White House arrival to cope, and when it comes to straight-up insulting the president, the examples are endless: covfefe, staring into the eclipse, tiny hands, tiny Trump, and his continuous difficulties operating umbrellas.

This aligns memes with past protest movements, which were fueled by similar drives, said James M. Jasper, who studies the cultural and emotional dimensions of protest movements as a sociology professor at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.

“The media [of protest art] have changed somewhat, but the purposes are similar: the blaming of villains, the identification of victims, as well as outrage at the villains and compassion for those victims,” Jasper told VICE. In this case, the targets are Trump and his inner circle, including everyone from Fox News to his wife and press secretaries.

At their core, all memes, regardless of their politics, are a tool for expression. “Memes help to articulate specific points, amplify ideas, and intensify emotions,” Burroughs said. “Something can be comedic or a joke and still be incredibly poignant.”

Most people interact with these images in fleeting ways as they scroll through their feeds, but creating or consuming political memes that align with one’s point of view can be therapeutic. They reflect what’s happening in society, and help justify feelings of rage and fear while helping us feel less alone. Every time I see a new iteration of the lawn-mowing boy meme pop up on my feed with thousands of retweets, it’s a refreshing reminder that others agree with me that Trump is absurd. The pure-hearted 11-year-old who Trump appears to be yelling at stands in for everyone who is living through his lies and verbal attacks. Explaining that in words took a long time, but one glance at this meme and you get it. Even if you’re just scrolling past quickly, the point resonates.

“You can express yourself with one picture of a meme better than a whole page of text,” Alan Schaaf, the CEO of image-hosting site Imgur, told VICE. “They’re easy to create, reuse, and remix. And what makes them works so well is that they’re so relatable. They make us laugh but have the ability to connect us around a common feeling.”

Schaaf pointed to how memes are primed for instant reactions to topical events, like how Twitter users trolled the inauguration and instantly pounced on Michael Flynn’s redacted sentencing memo. The crux of the joke is already out there and ready to go—all you have to do is find a punchline. This means whipping up a relatable, shareable reaction to a Trump gaffe or horrific policy takes only a few minutes or less.

“The fact that they’re so easy means people jump all over them in the moment to express themselves around that thing they just read or have something to say about,” Schaaf said. “They can say it easier, faster, and more to the point than they can with almost any other way.”

Memes can spread far more quickly than the songs or art projects of previous generations, and there’s such a low barrier to entry that anyone can make them; they can go viral in a matter of minutes.

Young internet users and activists—such as the March for Our Lives organizers and supporters—are pushing protest memes into the forefront of the conversation, even using them offline during marches and rallies. Then there’s politicians, like the reigning political queen of social media, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. From turning herself into a reaction meme to taking a jab at Trump by referencing an old video game line referred to as “one of the internet’s first real memes,” she understands instinctively the power of using memes to boost her messages. Others have at least tried out the same techniques: Hillary Clinton (or at least her social media team) burned Trump with the popular “delete your account” meme during the 2016 campaign. Not that it led to her winning, but still.

Then there is the category referred to as “activist memes,” which includes those like Permit Patty and BBQ Becky, nicknames that became shorthand for white people calling the police on black people for merely living their lives. These weren’t just jokes, but a way to name and call attention to a kind of racism that was rarely talked about. “There’s a whole genre of these activist memes that have emerged and are being used to push for social change and bring things like racism to the forefront using memes, and that’s extremely powerful,” Burroughs said. “They can help bring attention to issues of injustices. They circulate in a way that keeps up with that social media flow of information.”

The subjects of these activist memes, Jasper noted, are villains, and that’s a key part of protest art in general—in identifying social problems, the genre needs villains. “They’re an important step in arousing the anger or fear that can mobilize people,” he said. And in the Trump era, there’s no shortage of those.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Sage Lazzaro on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2tRV5qt
via cheap web hosting

America Is Now One of the Most Expensive Places on Earth to Get High

The amount of cash it takes to cop four commonly-used drugs in the United States has increased by over 40 percent, according to the latest edition of the annual Bloomberg Global Vice Index, which dropped last week. The measurement tool is sort-of like the Consumer Price Index, but instead of fruits or cereals, its proverbial "basket" contains a gram each of opioids, cocaine, weed, and some sort of amphetamine.

That array of substances, the Index found, collectively cost $846 in the United States, or more than the average worker between the age of 25 and 34 brought home per week in the second quarter of last year. (Overall, the Index found the share of average weekly American income needed to purchase a "basket" of drugs would be about 70 percent.) Given that millennials in America are known to spend up to 45 percent of their take-home pay on rent by age 30, the data, which is based in part on income numbers from the International Monetary Fund, suggest that having both a roof over your head and a bacchanalian consumption habit is next to impossible in the modern era. The numbers simply don't add up.



In fact, the only place where Bloomberg found it more pricey in US dollars (rather than as a share of income, which the Index tracked separately, and where the US also ranked highly) to obtain all this stuff was the Antipodes, a.k.a. Australia and New Zealand. But according to the Index, it cost a significantly higher share of one's weekly income to get fucked up in places like China and Japan (about 94 and 95 percent, respectively). All four cases may be a product of the countries' relative distance from some traditional zones of drug cultivation, as well as varying drug laws. Meanwhile, Luxembourg was said to be the most affordable place to get high, as a share of weekly income, in large part due to the fact that the average person there makes six-figures.

This all seems to run counter to the longstanding narrative that drugs are getting cheaper and more potent over time. In fact, the New York Times reported around this time last year that even meth was "purer, cheaper, and more lethal" than ever before. But according to Greg Midgette, an assistant professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Maryland and expert on drug markets, there are a number of reasons the drug market may be behaving differently than we thought.

VICE: I feel as if the common conception is that drugs are cheaper and stronger than ever, thanks in part to trends toward legalization. What's going on with these numbers? Forty percent in a year is astounding.
Greg Midgette: Yeah, 40 percent is astounding. I think there is a good chance that the index is capturing volatility in the underlying data for the US. If cities providing price data change over time, or if the average size of the purchase changes over time, either could swing prices dramatically. Prices can vary a lot from city to city, and quantity discounts can be really large for illegal drugs.

Prices have been declining in states' recreational marijuana markets, and it would be tough to argue illicit market prices would increase substantially while states' legal market prices were dropping. From the most recent publicly-available data from DEA through the end of 2016, cocaine and meth prices were decreasing. Heroin prices were up in 2016, but not by 40 percent. Other indicators of cocaine and meth use were up in 2017, which suggests prices might have increased. The 40 percent is still astounding though, especially if marijuana prices are flat or decreasing.

How does the Trump crackdown at the border affects the price of drugs? I could see it making cocaine skyrocket, but I'm also curious about marijuana.
I, too, am curious about that. Generally, interdiction should reduce supply, which should increase prices. More punitive polices should increase prices too. If I could go to prison for five years for getting caught with an ounce of crack, or if the chance that I’ll get caught increases, I'll charge my buyers more for that crack. For illegal markets, a portion of the price a buyer pays is the "risk premium," or what a seller would want to be compensated to take the chance of getting arrested and going to prison. That’s likely part of why, at least according to the Bloomberg Vice Index, prices are higher in the US than countries with similar incomes like Denmark and the Netherlands that are less punitive toward drug possession.

In states with recreational markets, legal weed is more expensive than black market weed for a few reasons. First, you probably won’t pay state and local taxes to your dealer. Second, recreational stores pay for stuff like licenses, testing, marketing, rent and utilities, and they need to charge more to make up for that. Third, that “risk premium” that a dealer in the illicit market faces is potentially smaller in recreational market states where possession of a small amount is legal in the eyes of the state. Finally, legal weed is typically higher potency, higher quality, and is less likely to have contaminants than illicit product, all of which can help command a higher price.

But legal weed can actually drive some prices down, right?
Recreational legalization might drive down prices in both legal and illegal markets because it spurs investment in cultivation practices and product development, which yield more reliable harvests, higher potent flower, and lower costs of extraction for other marijuana products. Those new developments are available for the legal and illegal markets. Furthermore, as equipment for methods like CO2 extraction becomes cheaper, the risk premium in the illegal market shrinks since it’s easier to conceal a near-odorless 90 percent THC extract than a skunky brick that is five times its physical size.

Are there trends you've seen about meth specifically versus the larger category of amphetamine-type substances? What about ecstasy?
Ninety percent or higher purity meth is apparently now the norm based on DEA data, so Walter White wouldn’t be special today. With the higher purity, we have also seen big increases in meth treatment admissions and seizures. That suggests meth consumption is growing, and potentially pretty rapidly. If the opioid epidemic wasn’t so terrifying and justifiably attention-consuming, I think we’d be really worried about meth. Psychostimulant-related overdoses were actually up 200 percent between 2012 and 2017—300 percent if you count cases that include fentanyl. It's also worth noting that we can’t separate out meth from other psychostimulants in toxicology reports.

What can you extrapolate from the rise of street Oxy prices—as cited by the Index—in terms of how the government is handling the opioid crisis?
That’s a really tough question, and we always need to consider the potential for apocryphal data on illicit drug prices. I’m not sure what influence responses to the opioid epidemic at the local, state or federal levels of government have had on street Oxy prices. Abby Alpert, David Powell, and Rosalie Pacula have a recent paper that provides evidence that heroin overdoses increased when Purdue reformulated OxyContin to make it more difficult to crush. A fairly straightforward hypothesis is that a share of dependent Oxy users turned to heroin when inhaling and injecting Oxy was made harder. Prescribing practices for opioid painkillers have also been put under scrutiny, and prescribing rates have fallen by 22 percent between 2013 and 2017. Fentanyl also started showing up in bootleg Oxy and in heroin over that period, making those drugs really toxic. One plausible, but purely speculative, explanation is that real non-counterfeit prescription opioids including Oxycodone could become really valuable in the illicit market because the legal alternatives are scarce and the other illicit alternatives are scary.

This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Allie Conti on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2H7LEuO
via cheap web hosting

The Netflix Nostalgia Wave Has Come to 'The Baby-Sitters Club'

Get ready to return to Stoneybrook, Connecticut—Netflix has ordered a 10-episode live-action adaptation of Ann M. Martin’s best-selling series The Babysitters Club. According to Deadline, Martin will serve as a producer on the show, and the original core characters—Kristy Thomas, Mary Anne Spier, Claudia Kishi, Stacey McGill, and Dawn Schafer—will all be there (though casting is yet unknown.) The Netflix series will follow these five best friends through the tribulations of adolescence, addressing themes like interpersonal relationships, divorce, and racism through a modern day update to these girls' babysitting business.

"I’m amazed that there are so many passionate fans of The Baby-Sitters Club after all these years," Martin said in a statement. "I’m honored to continue to hear from readers—now grown, who have become writers, editors, teachers, librarians, filmmakers—who say that they see a reflection of themselves in the characters of Kristy and her friends."

The Baby-Sitters Club was incredibly popular at its peak, selling roughly 178 million copies. Martin wrote more than 34 novels in the series—tailored towards middle grade readers—but the narrative universe spawned over 300 additional books penned by a variety of authors, during its 1986-2000 run. Through these novels, which retailed roughly $4 around the time of their publishing, girls were able to learn about rites of passage and given a model for growing up. HBO adapted the show into a one season run in 1990, and Beacon Pictures produced a 1995 feature film, but the story's appeal has endured even 30 years later.

“The themes of The Baby-Sitters Club still resonate 30 years after the original book series was released, and there has never been a more opportune time to tell an aspirational story about empowering young female entrepreneurs," Melissa Cobb, VP Kids & Family at Netflix said in a statement.

This show may be another potential hit in the roll tide of 90s and early 2000s remakes. Millennial cultural artifacts are popping up left and right—Neopets is getting launched as a mobile app this summer, the Jonas Brothers announced their reunion this morning, and just last year Netflix released The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, an occult flavored reboot of Sabrina The Teenage Witch.

What these all have in common is a dedication to a demographic that has historically been marginalized or underserved—the adolescent girl. It has already been a banner year for films and television centered on this demographic, with shows like Pen15 and A24 films like Eighth Grade and Lady Bird. And thanks to this wave of Netflix reboots, it seems the adolescent girl will continue to finally get her due.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Nicole Clark on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2Tq9Q1S
via cheap web hosting

Inside New York's Fight to Decriminalize Sex Work

On Monday, more than 100 sex workers, state lawmakers, and activists gathered in Manhattan's Foley Square to mark the launch of their new coalition, Decrim NY. The group wants to make New York the first state in the US to decriminalize sex work. Sex workers have been organizing around the issue for a long time, but as Marie Solis pointed out in a story for Broadly, Decrim NY is pushing the movement forward with renewed conviction—thanks, in part, to the critical support of a handful of elected officials. On this episode of The VICE Guide to Right Now Podcast, we talk to Solis for the full story.

You can catch The VICE Guide to Right Now Podcast on Acast, Google Play, Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, or wherever you get your podcasts. And sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2H8HTVK
via cheap web hosting

Conservatives Are Bizarrely Claiming AOC Wants to Take Your Burger Away

If you don't regularly tune into the Fox News Expanded Universe, you probably don't remember that Sebastian Gorka, the credential-challenged, far-right-linked former Trump administration official who has since segued into a career as a conservative pundit, has an English accent. That's the second most surprising thing about the below clip of Gorka fear-mongering at the Conservative Political Action Conference, which is like comic-con for people who have long explanations for why they aren't racist. The first most surprising thing was the content of his speech.

"They want to rebuild your home, they want to take away your hamburgers. This is what Stalin dreamt about but never achieved," Gorka told the crowd Thursday. "You are on the front lines of the war against communism coming back to America under the guise of [goofy voice] 'Democratic Socialism'... Donald J. Trump is never going to let it happen, and as he said to Congress, America will never be a socialist country!"

The crowd cheered at this, because this is the sort of thing you cheer at CPAC, but wait, so—hamburgers?

Yes, hamburgers. Naturally, this is about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the left-wing congresswoman who routinely gives the right a conniption simply by existing. More specifically, it's about the AOC-backed Green New Deal, a far-reaching plan to drastically reduce US carbon emissions by transforming the economy. (The Green New Deal includes a lot about upgrading buildings to be more climate-friendly, hence Gorka's ominous threats about leftists wanting to "rebuild your home.") One of the ways Ocasio-Cortez and other climate hawks want to fight the problem is by addressing factory farms, which produce harmful emissions in a variety of ways, including "farting cows," which was an infamous line from a controversial FAQ posted by Ocasio-Cortez's team after the Green New Deal was introduced. Many experts and environmentalists agree that eating less meat would help the planet because it would mean less meat production and therefore less emissions and pollution.

Ocasio-Cortez expressed this widely accepted view while talking to erstwhile VICELAND hosts Desus and Mero on their new show last week: "It’s not to say you get rid of agriculture. It’s not to say we’re going to force everybody to go vegan or anything crazy like that... It’s to say, listen, we’ve got to address factory farming. Maybe we shouldn’t be eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Like, let’s keep it real.”

There are good-faith critiques of the Green New Deal—concerns about its most radical elements, like the jobs guarantee intended to ease the economy-wide shift the GND represents, as well as its presumably astronomic cost. But it's also been attacked by a wave of bullshit. That FAQ included a bit about how a goal was to reduce dependence on air travel, which in Republican hands became a ban on airplanes. Similarly, conservatives are now claiming that AOC is coming to pry your hamburger from your grease-stained fingers. It's not just Gorka, either—at a recent anti-GND press conference, GOP members of Congress ate hamburgers as props:

Then there was the storm of coverage from Lifezette-tier right-wing publications after Ocasio-Cortez and her chief of staff were photographed having a dinner that appeared to include a hamburger. It would be as a stunning bit of hypocrisy if AOC had called for a ban on hamburgers, which of course she never did—she just thinks people should maybe eat them less.

In isolation, this non-scandal is (sorry) a nothingburger, but it shows how the conservative spin cycle operates. Why attack Democrats' actual positions when you can invent a more extreme, hysterical version of those positions and then decry the imaginary socialists? This played out when Republicans falsely claimed Ocasio-Cortez wanted to tax 70 percent of Americans' income (she was only talking about people who earned over $10 million a year, and even then was only going to slap that rate on their income above that threshold), or when conservatives routinely compare late-term abortion to infanticide. A version of this also showed up when Senate Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell conflated an electoral fraud scheme allegedly perpetrated by a shady North Carolina operative to help a Republican get elected to Congress with the (extremely rare) phenomenon of in-person voter fraud. This happened in real time this week when Congressman Mark Meadows claimed that Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib called him a racist when she actually said he was merely doing something racist.

It can be an effective tactic because declarations about murdered babies and the seizure of meat attract coverage (like this article), rile up the base, and are easier to make than nuanced arguments about Democrats' real positions. It also puts Democrats on the defensive, forced to explain that wait, no, they don't want to end air travel, they just want to build high-speed rail because blah blah blah—as the saying goes, when you're explaining, you're losing.

The good news for Democrats is that policies like the Green New Deal have strong support, according to polls. They shouldn't feel obligated to respond to ridiculous bad-faith arguments, especially when the people making those arguments are for some reason angrily waving a burger around. They should talk up the benefits, spell out why these massive new programs are necessary, and hope that everyone who isn't at CPAC continues to not really care that Sebastian Gorka exists.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Harry Cheadle on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2tHmN8W
via cheap web hosting

Why Lilly Singh's Bisexuality Is a Huge Moment for the South Asian Community

This article originally appeared on VICE Canada.

Remember the scene from Bend it Like Beckham—the 2002 hit about a girl coming-of-age in a traditional Punjabi family in the UK—when Jess’ sister’s almost in-laws thought they saw her kissing Jules and they called off the wedding? “Why couldn’t you like boys like the rest of us,” the sister asked Jess—short for Jasminder Singh—and the mother said, “Look at her bringing shame on the family.”

Well, Jess did like boys, it was just a misunderstanding, and later the wedding did happen. But the family’s reaction was right out of a handbook because being gay is still related to shame in most South Asian families.

Many South Asian families in the West still find it difficult to even talk about sex, and would rather have us believe babies are born from holding hands, let alone discuss sexuality outside of a traditional heterosexual relationship. So when Toronto-born YouTube celebrity Lilly Singh came out as bisexual on Twitter, it was nothing less than a historic moment for the South Asian LGBTQI community, given her massive popularity.

Singh’s videos, through her own unique Canadian-Indian perspective, were among the first to bridge the gap between being “brown” and being Canadian, breaking a lot of stereotypes about being Indian along the way. In some of her videos, she’s touched on the difficulty of having a conversation sexual in nature with Indian parents, whom she plays herself—dressing up as the quintessential Indian mom and dad to play Paramjeet and Manjeet. Lilly’s real parents—who are in some of her videos reacting to her sexy Instagram pictures while she’s visibly nervous about their response—migrated to Toronto from Punjab, a state in north India.

Hazel Ann Hunter, a yoga teacher and an immigration officer, came out eight years ago as a lesbian to her parents, who also emigrated from India to Canada for a better life and opportunities. “It was hell and traumatizing telling my parents,” Hunter told VICE. It was around this time she actually found Singh’s videos and even though they didn't have anything to do with being gay, they were about self-love—exactly what Hunter needed at the time.

“There was no representation at that time and I was looking to resonate with someone like me. I loved that Lilly was so open and vulnerable in her videos. She just has this unique ability to connect with people,” Hunter said.

Singh’s comic take on the idiosyncrasies unique to South Asians through videos like “Indian parents explain where babies come from” and “Telling my parents about my boyfriend” made her instantly relatable around the world. Eventually, as the Scarborough comic’s popularity soared, she even collaborated with mega-popular Bollywood stars like Madhuri Dixit and Priyanka Chopra. “I used to watch Priyanka Chopra in movies, now we having girl’s night and popping booties,” Singh, dressed as her YouTube mom, raps in one of her videos.

On Sunday, while I was preparing myself for bed and mindlessly scrolling through Twitter, Lilly Singh’s tweet with rainbow-colored hearts, left me stumped. Proud, but absolutely stumped. Superwoman, Singh’s alias, called her bisexuality a superpower.

Like Singh, I’m Indian and I know that conversations about sexuality are as rare as unicorns, the YouTube star’s favorite animal. When I saw her tweet, my first thought was, “how did she even tell her parents?” I imagined her sitting her parents down and stuttering and stumbling to get the words out. And that’s usually what a lot of LGBTQ South Asians also discuss among themselves—how to come out when they’re unsure whether their parents even know what being gay means.

Jag Nagra, a 34-year-old Canadian with Punjabi heritage, came out to her parents ten years ago.

“I spent a lot of years figuring out whether I’d ever be able to come out and live openly,” she told VICE. Now she has a wife and a daughter. The Vancouver illustrator describes her coming out as an “impactful experience,” a conversation that finished with her mother giving her the tightest hug of her life.

Being gay is almost a taboo in the subcontinent—lack of education, awareness, and the fact that no South Asian public figure, at least no one with Singh’s profile, has acknowledged their sexuality. Nagra recalled her friend’s coming out to his mother, who thought he wanted a sex change when he told her he was gay.

Even Bollywood, which produces hundreds of movies watched by millions around the world, until as recently as this year has never openly included homosexuality as a part of its main storyline, but rather only depicted it facetiously through movies like Dostana, starring Chopra.

So in the middle of such tightly packed silence, when a world popular role model like Lilly Singh comes forward, she’s almost forcing people to have a much needed conversation. In claiming her bisexuality, Singh is educating older South Asian generations and spreading awareness about other sexualities.

A recent high school graduate in India, who identifies herself as queer and gay, has been following Singh’s videos since 2013. Janet* hasn’t come out to her traditional Tamil family yet because she’s not “ready to test their love.” She says she may come out to them after she’s financially independent in order to cope with unknown consequences. But she definitely feels empowered after Singh’s public embrace of her sexuality, and calls it a “game changer” for the South Asian LGBTQ community, which has never before had a role model that fully represents them.

“If and when I come out, I’ll be able to show my parents that… being gay doesn’t stop me from having it all—I can be successful and have a full life,” the 18-year-old told VICE.

Nagra, too, thinks Singh’s public acceptance of her bisexuality is “huge” for the community because it will help give confidence to people trying to come out to their families and they can show her as an example of someone living a completely normal and successful life. “If someone like Lilly Singh had come out a decade ago, it would have totally changed things for me. I didn’t know any other Indian Punjabi gay person then,” she said.

Two decades ago, Canadian-Indian Director, Deepa Mehta’s movie, Fire, about two women falling in love, was met by violence and vandalism in India. But things are definitely improving for the LGBTQ community through yearly gay pride marches across the country and the fact that a recently released movie, Ek Ladki Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Lagha, about a lesbian coming out to her family, starring a popular Bollywood face, was met with zero protests.

Last year, the Indian Supreme Court struck down a colonial era law criminalizing gay sex, a historic moment for gay rights in the largest South Asian country. And now, by coming out, a relatable world celebrity like Lilly Singh, a.k.a., Superwoman, has created history in her own way by punching through a wall for the community, stirring conversation, and giving confidence to LGBTQ South Asians around the world.

Since coming out, Hunter says her parents have had a 180 degree turn about her sexuality. She showed Singh’s tweet to her mom, also a Superwoman fan, a few days ago. “'Her too?' My mom asked, surprised. It was like a realization for her that this really is a common thing in our community too. What Lilly has done is profound.”

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Shreya Kalra on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2EDhihQ
via cheap web hosting

Lance Bass of NSYNC Is Making a Movie About How Much People Loved NSYNC

Lance Bass, pseudo-astronaut and everybody's second-favorite member of NSYNC, is developing a new film project, Variety reports—and it's, uh, about a couple of women who really liked NSYNC, apparently.

The whole thing is based on the true story of Meredith Sandberg and Winter Byington, two NSYNC superfans who drove across the country to try and catch every single NSYNC show during the boy band's 2001 US tour.

"It’s a really fun story about these girls that win a Winnebago on The Price Is Right and follow us on tour—which randomly happened," Bass told Variety in a recent interview. He also has plans to potentially bring the story to Broadway after the movie drops, he said, which sounds about as likely as Tommy Wiseau's Room musical, but whatever. Bass is producing the movie under his production banner, the aptly-named Lance Bass Productions, which also has a doc about sketchy-ass boy band mastermind Lou Pearlman premiering at SXSW in March.

According to a 2001 Washington Post article, the whole fan bus saga started after Sandberg and Byington, both in their early 20s at the time, hatched a, uh, pretty convoluted plan: They would somehow get onto The Price Is Right, then win an RV, and then live out of said RV for the entire summer while they followed NSYNC to all of their shows. Sure, why not?

It's the kind of vaguely thought-out, wholly implausible scheme that countless stoned kids have joked about while watching gameshows at 3 AM, but somehow, the duo pulled it off. They actually went on The Price Is Right, they actually won a goddamn motorhome, and then they actually dropped out of college to follow NSYNC around the country like a couple of bubblegum Deadheads. They wound up seeing 38 of the 39 tour stops, missing just one because their RV got a flat.

Of course, NSYNC shows weren't exactly like Dead shows. Each one was nearly identical, down to the fact that the performers wore basically the same outfits every night—"Sometimes they change shirts," Sandberg told the Post—but, nonetheless, the fangirls' story became a sensation. At one point, NSYNC themselves dropped by the bus for a visit. Now, nearly two decades later, one of those NSYNC members is turning their bizarre journey into a movie. What a world!

Take that as a lesson, all you stoned, footloose teenagers out there: Sometimes, your batshit dreams that have little-to-no chance of being realized actually pay off. It just might take 20 years and a failed space mission to get there.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2GQvHcY
via cheap web hosting

Black Creatives Tell Us What Black History Month Means to Them in 2019

This article first appeared on VICE Québec.

For some, Black History Month is a commercial and insignificant event. For others, it is the official symbol of black pride. As part of our Black Ideas series , we asked Lost, Wasiu, Izzy-S, Marilou Craft, Bonbon Kojak, Chloé Savoie-Bernard, and many others about Black History Month and its meaning to them.

Here are their answers.

Chloé-Savoie Bernard, Author

1550860285283-VQV_BHM_8_2

"I remember when I was little, I took the bus and I saw signs for the Black History Month celebrations. I did not quite understand what it meant, but by the time I was four or five, I was happy that there was a month for us. As long as we are not in a fair and equal representation, Black History Month will have its relevance. "

Bonbon Kojak, DJ

1550860310979-VQV_BHM_4_1

"You have to take advantage of this month of February, even if there are still people who are disturbed by it. It allows us, as a community, not to lose hope in this fair world. Our ancestors lived in horror, our parents lived in horror and in fear—all we can do is dream. That's the resistance. "

Marilou Craft, Author and Theater Teacher

1550860334278-VQV_BHM_12_2

"Every year, from the moment the celebrations begin, there is always a white person who comes in to say, 'When is the month for white history?' I think what needs to be understood is that these celebrations are related to the feeling of pride. When you're part of a dominant group, pride can be perceived as arrogant and unnecessary, while for a continually under-represented group that never really has a place in society, it's essential to be proud of to exist. Unfortunately, if there was not that month, there would be no time to celebrate our culture. It's just essential to me. "

Stella Stone, Drag Queen

1550860379003-VQV_BHM_17_2

"I have the impression that it has become a little commercial, all these theater pieces, these books, these shows that come out in February... It's exciting from a media point of view, but me, as a black person, I wear that skin, that identity and all that comes with it, 365 days a year. "

Lost, Rapper

1550860411478-VQV_BHM_11_1

"Black month? [laughs] For me, I do not even understand why we need a month in particular to remember all the things that black culture has brought to our civilizations. I think that throughout the year we should understand what black people have lived, and still live for today. Slavery is behind us, but racism is still there. We need more than just a month to stop it. "

Schelby Jean-Baptiste, Actress

1550860576041-2019-02-22
Shelby Jean-Baptiste (left) and Stephie Geraldine Mazunya (right). Photo Jules Bédard

"I think Black History Month is important for future generations, who are not represented in textbooks and who are not naturally inclined to go down in history. I recently did a photo series entitled SisterHood as a Form of Resistance, which highlights the work of black actresses in Quebec and the issues we face. In my opinion, it is important to take advantage of this month to undertake initiatives that showcase the work of our community, but it would be nice if the interest extends beyond the 28 days of February. "

Wasiu, Rapper

1550861414592-VQV_BHM_19_1

"It's a damn good question because part of me says: It's just the story, so why are we down? It's just a part of the story. So we just learn and appreciate history. But another part of me says: because of under-representation or because we're not talking about the whole story, we have to spend a month talking about black history. But I think I'm leaning more for this. let's get to a point where we tell the truth. We know what happened, we talk about it. I'm not accusing you of things that happened 500 years ago. I'm just saying, here's what happened and teach it all. We should talk about these things every time we talk about history, and not reduce that to a month with 28 days, sometimes 29 days. "

Izzy-S, Rapper

1550861443772-VQV_BHM_10_1

"It's always good to talk about it. Because it allows me to sit here today and talk about facts that have to change. But Black History Month is like anything: It's supposed to be every day. It is not because today it is Black History Month that we give them attention, we respect them and then the next day, the month is over, and we treat them still like shit. "

Djamilla Touré, Model

1550861467273-VQV_BHM_9_2

"I think that already, it is necessary, but, clearly, would have to go off this month. Black History Month is also here to remind us of our greatest battles, our greatest successes, our greatest acquisitions, and most of all, to remember all that has been brought as a contribution to today's mass culture."

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2IWxWxt
via cheap web hosting

We Ranked How Badly the 'Game of Thrones' Characters Sit on the Iron Throne

HBO just released fresh promotional images of various Game of Thrones characters sitting on the Iron Throne to hype up season eight. Unfortunately, the photos don’t appear to reveal much about who will actually win the big war for Westeros. In fact, they seem to imply that any of these 20 principals, including folks like, uh, Samwell and Grey Worm, might have a real shot at the crown. Personally, my money is still on T-Pain.

Anyway, one thing the shots do reveal is the degree to which each of these throne gamers sit comfortably in the great Lazy Boy of power. In the spirit of desperately wringing content from whatever scraps of Thrones content HBO tosses us, I decided to rank each of these characters by how god-awful their posture is, in descending order from "Seven Hells, what are you doing to your body" to "pretty normal."

In fairness to Jon and the gang, the Iron Throne is intentionally very uncomfortable, even more so iN tHe bOoKs. It’s a metaphor for power or something. Whatever. Has the small council ever considered swapping the pointy sword seat with a standing desk?

Minor spoilers ahead.

20. Jon Snow

This stance. What? Maybe it’s a callback to the season one promo art, but Jon looks less like a king and more like some half-drunk dude peeking at you thirstily from across the room in a crowded club. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising, considering the King in the North also Juuls. This is canon, people.

19. Davos Seaworth

We can perhaps forgive the Onion Knight for not sitting properly, as he was once just a smuggler born in humble Flea Bottom that Stannis blah blah blah etc. etc. We’ve all heard this spiel too many times, moving on.

18. Euron Greyjoy

Euron’s got a craned neck thing going on here like Davos, but at least he’s clutching the armrests, I guess? Gotta give him credit—despite having a name that’s uncomfortably close to “urine,” dude is a badass. I want a Euron spinoff.

17. Grey Worm

Grey Worm, another certified badass, is also leaning forward uncomfortably. He is, however, holding a knife, so that bumps him up a bit from the other leaners.

16. Melisandre

The Red Woman is doing some kind of slight shift to the side here, which doesn’t look particularly pleasant. Who sits like this? Baby killers, that’s who. Next!

15. Brienne of Tarth

Brienne is wearing a bunch of armor while sitting down. Metal on metal—that has to suck, right?

14. The Hound

Major points deducted for the manspreading. Major. Points.

13. Arya Stark

This one is interesting: Needle almost functions more as as one of those fancy sword canes (à la Crispin Glover in Charlie’s Angels) than a straight-up sword, but I dunno. Still looks awk.

12. Jorah Mormont

I honestly forgot this guy was still on the show.

11. The Night King

The quote in the Tweet was actually said by Old Nan in season one, not the Night King. Does that mean Old Nan is actually the Night King? In this essay, I will… (1/467).

10. Theon Greyjoy

In the words of Twitter user @citizencain602, “Lmfaoooooo Reeeek???”

9. Bran Stark

Ever since he busted his ass in season one, Bran has spent a lot of time sitting. Despite this, the angle at which he's situated on the throne looks pretty funky. Come to think of it, these all look sort of photoshopped, right?

8. Varys

Honestly writing this list is taking way longer than I thought so I’m just gonna put Varys at eight and move on.

7. Samwell Tarly

Pretty good work from timid Sammy boy— hips back, feet firmly planted, but he’s still just the tiniest bit hunched over. That's gonna cost him.

6. Tyrion Lannister

For a man of admittedly short stature, the Imp looks pretty imposing on the seat of power. Also, check out the way he’s clutching that knobby armrest thing. If that doesn’t scream comfort, I don’t know what does.

5. Jaime Lannister

Do you think there’ll be a scene in season eight where Jaime rips off his gold hand and throws it at someone? I sure hope so. Anyways, shoulders back, arms crooked 90 degrees at the elbows, neck straight: nice form.

4. Missandei

Phenomenal work here, sitting with both feet on the ground and her knees at or above hip level. Was that so hard, people?!

3. Cersei Lannister

OK, seriously, these heads are just, like, photoshopped onto the bodies, right? What’s going on with the sides of her face?

2. Sansa Stark

Can I stop this yet?

1. Daenerys Targaryen


Strong. Strong. Very, very strong. Ten out of ten. Please just drop the new season already.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Peter Slattery on Twitter .



from VICE https://ift.tt/2BYAR2v
via cheap web hosting

These Disturbing, Hyperrealistic Pet Masks Are Truly the Stuff of Nightmares

Are you a proud pet owner who secretly dreams of melding your corporeal form with your cat or dog in order to become some kind of half-human, half-beast monstrosity that violates all laws of God and man? If so, look no further!

On Thursday, AV Club uncovered a brand new service in Japan that will craft custom, hyperrealistic masks for pet owners based on their beloved animals—and the prototypes are deeply, deeply fucking terrifying.

Watch this if you dare:

A Japanese press release announcing the launch of this horrific project says that the whole thing was dreamed up by the companies Shindo Rinka and 91, the latter of which appears to specialize in life-like animal masks—so you'll have them to blame when these things catch on.

1551378621868-d32287-11-234332-5
Image via PR Times
1551378640442-d32287-11-384509-2
Image via PR Times
1551380225218-d32287-11-289568-8
Image via PR Times

If, for some reason, you long to look like some kind of faux-Ancient Egyptian god or a knockoff "King" from Tekken and money is no object, just head over to the Shindo Rinka website and sign up.

All you have to do is send in some photos of your pet, and the mask maestros will pick up their fake fur and translucent whiskers and lifeless animal eyes and work their magic. You, uh, also have to shell out upwards of $3,000, according to Grape, which first reported the story—but hey, putting together a disturbingly realistic pet mask probably isn't cheap.

Of course, the true metamorphosis won't be finished until the company starts making tiny human masks for the pets to wear, completing the cursèd union between Man and Beast and inextricably bonding you both forever and always, in this world and the next, but I guess we'll have to wait for that one.

No promises your dog or cat won't fucking hate you after you show up one day wearing its own face, either. That's a risk you'll just have to take.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2NA4jAy
via cheap web hosting

Photos That Show Brazilian Carnaval from a Different Perspective

A version of this article originally appeared on VICE Brazil.

If you live in São Paulo, Brazil, you know that when Carnaval comes to town, the otherwise calm streets turn into the venue for a raucous, multi-day mass celebration. In the same way that residents are used to watching people partying in full force, festival-goers are equally aware that whether they’re making out with a stranger or sambaing like there’s no tomorrow, a slew of others are watching them from the windows or terraces of their tall, residential buildings. It was this annual, voyeuristic exchange that prompted photographer and visual artist Raissa Nosralla, AKA Lady Gaia, to point her camera in the opposite direction of the street towards the audience on high.

"I've always liked taking pictures of street scenes, and Carnaval parades are perfect because people don't mind getting their pictures taken," the photographer told VICE Brazil. "Most of the time they don't see you, but if they do, they'll often strike a pose for the camera. It's all very spontaneous and—despite the fact that they're wearing costumes—I feel that people aren’t wearing any [societal] masks. They can be exactly who they are, without any filters."

Taken between 2015 and 2018, Lady Gaia’s photos focus on details that go unnoticed while people are partying, ranging from senior citizens bothered by all the noise in their neighborhood to other locals who appreciate that the party was brought straight to them. Some of them engage with the festival-goers directly, hosing them off with water to relieve them from the heat or displaying their children and pets through the window.

"There's more interaction between party people and local residents during smaller neighborhood parades. It's such a wonderful moment. I've seen some of the most beautiful things—the brotherhood and sisterhood between partiers and locals—and it's all based on mutual respect," she said.

Scroll down to see more of Lady Gaia’s Carnaval photos below:

1551207717757-Raissa_Nosralla_04
1551207716026-Raissa_Nosralla_09
1551207680604-Raissa_Nosralla_10
1551207713747-Raissa_Nosralla_14
1551207710934-Raissa_Nosralla_01
1551208163778-Raissa_Nosralla_16
1551208185966-Raissa_Nosralla_15
1551208244010-Raissa_Nosralla_13
1551208330022-Raissa_Nosralla_11
1551211540288-Raissa_Nosralla_12
1551211558627-Raissa_Nosralla_07
1551211580739-Raissa_Nosralla_08
1551211614664-Raissa_Nosralla_06

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

To see more work by Lady Gaia, visit her website or follow her on Instagram.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2UbYbkn
via cheap web hosting

Stop Picking Up Random African Children and Posting Them on Instagram

This article originally appeared on VICE UK.

I realize it's hard to see a black child smiling and resist the urge to pick them up and celebrate their joy, especially considering all the challenges that come with being young and dark in the wild. But: Do not pick up random black children. And: Do not force them into a picture with you.

It's a point that needs reinforcing because that's what British host and documentary filmmaker Stacey Dooley did for a recent post on Instagram, where she held up a black Ugandan boy with the caption: "OB.SESSSSSSSSSSSED *Heartbreak emoji*." Dooley discovered the boy while filming for Comic Relief—a segment you can easily visualize without needing to watch it.

Ext. African farm.

Camera sharp cuts to a closeup shot of a crying baby, flies orbiting his head.

Narrator: Matombi is eight years old, but he doesn't look it....

Dooley isn't the first pilgrim from the West to not promote their altruism by promoting their altruism, and certainly won't be the last. At this point, it's pretty much a rite of passage for every gap year voyager looking to justify their year off. In fact, so many people have done the same thing I almost felt sorry for her when Labour MP David Lammy called her out by name for it after pleading for an end to the white saviors complex.

The response to David Lammy stating what I thought was now accepted doctrine is a reminder that common sense is extremely uncommon. Angry white men across the country England have jumped to Dooley's defense, accusing the MP of being the racist one (!) by bringing race into it and not appreciating what a wonderful job Dooley is doing for even daring to go so far into the great jungle of Africa. Someone's uncle even tweeted: "This world needs more 'saviors', no matter their color."

And honestly, how can I argue with that? Being against superheroes is like being against sausage rolls. You'd have to be crazy! So let's be clear: Saviors are great. They save things that need saving.

But "white saviors" does not refer to that. It refers to a very specific need for the West to portray Africa as a crumbling place of red soil, flies, and kids who don't know it's Christmas time at all. It reinforces the view that Africans can never be the solution, that they are helpless without any agency of their own, and that sunshine and hope only comes when cradled in the warm, bright embrace of whiteness. It centers the celebrity over and above those whose lives they're supposedly trying to change. The young man in Dooley's post is not a prop and should not be treated as such.

Imagery is extremely important. It's something we all get wrong; VICE fucked up literally this morning. There are serious challenges facing Africa as a continent. Many of those challenges are universal because of the ramifications of colonialism and the way it divvied up the fruitful and fertile land, and forced grossly different cultures to form singular nations against their will. It's something that a majority of nations are still trying to come to terms with. In that is space for anyone of good mind and spirit to do their bit where needed, hopefully directed by people on the ground.

So if that's you, and you're wondering how to maneuver around this minefield without being called out for being racist, then go ahead, but paste this question on your bottle of Factor 50+: How would I act in a homeless shelter in London?

Would you ask everyone to stop what they were doing to pose for a photo with you as the centerpiece? Upon seeing a child going about their child-like business, would you hold them aloft like a trophy? I assume not. So resist the urge when walking around a village.

And if you do find yourself in an African country and feel the urge to post a photo of something, I highly recommend fruit. The fruit is amazing. Post photos of fruit.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Dipo Faloyin on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2ElPCgk
via cheap web hosting

Here's Every Office Nemesis You're Going to Have at Your Job

This article originally appeared on VICE UK.

If you have made it this far throughout life without generating some sort of enemy or enemies, I am of the belief that you have done it wrong. Sure: It is nice to be nice to people. I'm a big advocate of nice. However: Has someone ever been nice to you in a way that made you hate them? Everyone who ever came in to speak to you at a school assembly, or something. An overly-cheerful ticket inspector. Is this just me? I just have this revolting, gag-like reflex: When someone is nice to me without agenda, I hate them to my core. It cannot just be me.

Work is good for cultivating little one-sided hate affairs. From my desk now I can see one person I actively hate, two people I'm not exactly keen on, and one person I'm on the fence about (maybe I will choose one day to tip over and hate them entirely; perhaps they will be spared). And I'm not the only one: A 7,000-respondent survey from Totaljobs this week found 62 percent of us had a work enemy, with 48 percent of those having one enemy and 43 percent having multiple. Of the 69 percent who said they'd done anything to avoid their work enemy, 17 percent said they’d pulled sick days to avoid them (which I both don't believe and consider to be the behavior of a lame-wad anyway), but the point is... as a news hook for a fun and topical list... it's good!


The man who is simply too loud

Women make their noises sometimes, I concede this—clonking heels on hardwood floors; light, feminine humming; the mild sound of trying to convince themselves they like cottage cheese—but men seem to conduct an orchestra of unique sounds that emit from their body, loudly. From their interactions between their body and various equipment (slammed doors, clattering photocopiers, shouting "FUCK!" directly at a laptop screen); and from the general background static of them being alive. I used to work with this exceptional pink man who used to cheerfully whistle—actually whistle, whistle-while-you-work march-into-the-mines-to-die whistling—and once he'd got comfortable enough whistling aloud in the office, he graduated to fully singing lines of verse, out of nowhere, at a pitch just above a speaking voice, i.e. somewhere between chatting and yelling. That's unacceptable, dude. I'm trying to send an email here. Sing at home. Sing away from me.

The office-all E-mailer

Self-explanatory.

Person who always constantly fucking forgets how to do simple fucking parts of their job

Jobs aren't hard, are they? Everyone has this mad idea that their job is very hard, and that certain hallowed manual labor jobs are also very hard—mining, for some reason, the exemplar of that, but also "working in a factory" and "cleaning"—and then everyone else’s job beyond and below that is not hard, and anyone complaining about tiredness or soreness or mental burnout should nut up. This is because very few jobs are genuinely hard: They batter you with repetition, with the grind after grind after grind of making you wake up and commute in, day after day after day. They make life hard by being a constant concrete-solid wedge in the middle of it. But the actions you do there are very rarely actually difficult. If you spent a month only working on days you actually felt up for working, you'd get more done than if you spent a month going to work 30 days in a row. Somebody who is good at the economy please help.

Still: Some dumbfuck in your office in your exact pay bracket keeps forgetting simple stuff like "how to do email attachments" or "where the invoice.docx template is stored on the shared drive," and you have to keep going over to help them. "Remind me," they keep saying, "what's our fax number?" You point to the Post-It you wrote the fax number on last time they asked for the fax number, which was six days ago. "Hah!" they say. "Imagine still using fax!" Imagine not having the gifts of retainment and independent thought at the age of 29.

The guy who was such a dickhead you all had to get training

Workplace harassment training is obviously a very vital part of the current ecosystem of office life, and refresher courses every six months to a year are more than necessary in a culture that is only now transitioning from "slap the receptionist on the ass as you go past… and tip her a cigarette at Christmas!" to "what do you mean, officer, that's bad?" But there is something particularly grating about all being called in for a half-day training because some guy in sales shouted "BA–DONK–A–DONK!" in the corridor at one of the cleaners and for some reason didn't get fired, and managed to wiggle out of training today because he's playing client golf, while you have to all spend an afternoon cramming a full day's worth of work into a three-hour time slot. That’s annoying, and that makes him your enemy.

The smug boss who denied you a promotion

The natural order of life is to hate your boss: it is an ancient system, older than the earth, a hierarchy that derives from nature. You think the lioness doesn't hate the lion she toils all day for on the savannah? You think the cow doesn’t begrudge the farmer who milks her? We are all of us here, in the dirt, chewing grass and hating upward. That's why that guy in the glass corner office who keeps taking two-hour lunches rattles your cage so much. That’s why you want to bite his throat out—because of nature.


READ:


That kid who got promoted ahead of you

Remember that six-week period where you sensed a promotion might be in the offing—middle manager quit at short notice; no immediate replacement announced; water cooler murmurings about "promoting from within"—so you started actually trying at your job in an effort to get that extra 10K a year? You started dressing like the contract you signed in your first week set out ("business-casual, but leaning toward business") instead, of those worn-out T-shirts you've been getting away with? You wore a tie that time, remember? You actually got in on time four days out of five? Did at least three unnecessary CC emails to your boss showing you were tracking down someone for a problem you sort of maybe caused? Then they promoted Rory, who started a month after you. But remember that week you tried? Remember how productive you were when you were focused? Remember how much you hate Rory, the little fucking cretin, especially as he put you on that Saturday stock indexing shift, smiling all the time as he did it through his little rat tee—

Anyone who is more popular than you

Only I am the center of the universe, dude, stop making the girls from PR laugh out loud. That’s a foul ball.

The Criminal shitter

There is an element of intrigue and suspense to making your enemy the one person in the office who has horrid, hard, unflushable, Guinness-blended shits every morning. This person is always making it to the bathroom before you. And somehow they are always leaving the cubicle door banging just before you make it in but never making themselves known to you, and sometimes the shits are present—bobbing there, brown and proud, staring at you like it has eyes in, forcing you to flush it—and sometimes the ghost of it is there, just the marks down the bowl, but there, in the air, a miasma. Walk out of the bathroom and look every person in the office in the eye. Who is mistily sweating, and staring too intensely at their screen? Who has difficulty standing up and walking elegantly from their desk to the printer? One of these fuckers is the shitter. One of these assholes took the shit. And you will find them so help you God—

Men-only: The power stance pisser

Once worked with a man I can only describe as "curiously vampyric," whose favorite trick was to bowl into the bathrooms after me and adopt a power pose at the urinal—literally as if a power ranger were about to kung-fu an energy orb out of their body, only through his dick—and there he would stand, powerful and steady stream, trying to talk to me about invoices while I tried to wash my hands. A pretty solid rule I like to stick to at work is "please don’t talk to me while you’re holding your dick." See how it works for you.


READ:


Door withholders and door non-thankers

Every company in Britain seems to think that it's so important it's at risk of constant moped-gang robbery, guns-in-the-air staff hold-up or just general violent crime, and as a result they have an intricate scan-in/scan-out staff pass system—a rotating collection of security guards and weird heavy doors that are slow, slow, slow and then very fast to close, even though the only things of any worth in any office is 15 x laptops and 40 x four-liter jugs of milk, nothing else. This means every morning and lunch hour you get caught in this liminal space between heaving a door open and then touching it, just with the very tips of your fingers, to balance it open for the people behind you, an embarrassing and humiliating ritual of human decency. If anyone holds the door for you? "Thank you." You hold the door for anyone else? "Thank you." You don’t even need to say it loudly, just under your breath. Anyone who breaks the rules? Get them in a headlock and march them direct to HR. Get them fired on the spot.

Fruit hog

Listen, I know the only perk your office offers is a box of 40 pieces of fruit for a team of 70 people, but if I see you walking out of there triumphant with a plum, one banana, and a shiny green apple I’m tackling you into the recycling bin while screaming "ONE PIECE OF FRUIT EACH." Without unspoken rules there is anarchy, your greed is not unnoticed.

Anyone who laughs at a joke a member of management clumsily weaves into department speeches

I suppose it’s good that when a scab announces themselves out loud like that in case you’re planning any union agitation, but they’re still going in the nemesis bin, don’t you worry about that.

'Quick favor' asker

If the favor was quick, they’d do it themselves. Don’t do that slow, languid walk up to my desk just to ask me to do your job for you, you pig.

Music controllers

It is likely you have a stereo in your office. It is also likely everyone in your office with access to that stereo has a simply psychotic idea of what music is good to listen to while you’re working. I used to work in a lick-the-envelope-and-wait-until-5 PM office, and in them, listening to any sort of daytime radio or pop playlist is absolutely fine: It’s not like you’re actively concentrating on anything, so if anyone puts a Beyoncé banger on it doesn’t necessarily matter. As soon as your job involves any degree of concentration, though, that shit has to stop: as soon as this country rejects Brexit and enters willfully into my Iron Rule, the only office music allowed by law will be those "lo-fi beats 2 relax 2" YouTube playlists and literally nothing else. Anyone who puts Kelly Clarkson on halfway through a work day goes to the gulag.

But this goes both ways. I think we all agree the most we’ve spiritually felt connected to the ethereal idea of "The Party" is at 4 PM on a Friday afternoon at work, when you all know it’s home-time and nobody’s getting anything done. At that point, it is— and again, when iron rule comes into power, will become law—necessary to put "Thong Song" on as loud as it will go. Anyone who ruins that golden hour by shushing or turning the music down passive-aggressively from their computer because they're "on a phone call"? See you in the gulag, mate!

Office all repliers

"Please take me off this chain"—dude, it's an email, delete it. You could have just spent the energy deleting it. Now we all have to delete it. A thousand clicking fingers, working in unison, to erase your opinion. That’s what you just did to yourself.


READ:


Wireless headphone guy

Curious office beast, this, because I don’t truly understand who is still making decisions over the phone in this, The Year of Our Lord 2K19, but every office in the country has minimum one and up to three obnoxious shithead, knobhead, dickheads who walk around shouting into their laptop on wireless headphones—always walking, always on a laptop, always on wireless headphones so they can’t regulate the volume of their own voices—and yet if I, say, float a desk chair into their path as they walk around shouting, I’m the one that gets sent to HR.

Anyone with loud shoes

Three people in this office regularly wear loud shoes. Don’t know their names but I know the sounds of their walks. They are my enemies, and will be until death.

Exactly one security guard

Convinced that work security guards are the natural progression of the ancient chanting brothers who always seemed to guard bridges in myths, only instead of "one lying and one telling the truth," it goes "one is quite sound and brings your Amazon package to your desk, one routinely forgets who you are even though you’ve worked here four years and won’t let you through the double doors because you’ve forgotten your ID."

That person who thinks their you friend but they are not

I am normally very on my guard during work kitchen encounters anyway—the tight ballet of trying to throw a teaspoon in the sink between pirouetting microwavers and someone trying to put a whole tote bag in the fridge, the design nightmare of five head-height cupboard doors that somehow open into one another—but you have to stay doubly alert when someone tries to make minuscule smalltalk with you: One jag outside of the boundaries of the pre-defined conversation, one accidental genuine enquiry into their weekend, and suddenly you've made a friend.

"Do you ever eat lunch?" they say, and you have to disappointedly admit: yes, every single day. "We should do lunch." Should we? Then you get back to your desk and find a Google Cal invitation—it’s been six months and you’ve just now learned this guy’s called "Jack"—and now you have to accept, and walk to get lunch with them on Friday, and ask about his weekend (don’t ask about his weekend the answer is literally always the same), and now he’s your friend, your work friend, and you have to do this once every two weeks until you leave.

That moment where you have to address that perhaps you are the dickhead and everyone else is normal

It is possible that you are going around your office walking too loudly and coughing into the fridge and leaving toast crumbs everywhere and laminating posters and putting them up above white goods and recycling incorrectly and using the toilet in such a psychotic way that there has to be an office-all email and someone replies to that email and starts the chain all over again, maybe you are wadding up too much kitchen paper towel or using all the teabags or doing your job wrong in such a slight and unnoticeable way that the next person up the chain has to fix it, but never has the energy to tell you how to actually do it because it's easier to just fix it, and maybe you’re slow on the email or your lack of organization ("No, I’ll remember it," you say, you being of course the person who has forgotten four things a week since their inception, not even their birth, their inception), holding other things up, further down the line, or maybe everyone is answering the phone normally and your reluctance to answer a ringing phone—when a phone rings you look at it like a cat scared by a hoover, don't you? Maybe that is what’s bringing this company down, isn’t it, inch by inch by inch, and yeah you float through this job because it doesn’t mean anything to you, but when the CEO sadly makes an announcement at the end-of-year, you immediately shoot your hand up and ask if there’s going to be salary increases, and all around you, faces, turning, imperceptibly, all of them chalking up one final additional mark in their head: That prick is my enemy, they're all thinking, I hate that prick with my life.

Maybe that’s you. Maybe that's just who you are.

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Joel Golby on Twitter.



from VICE https://ift.tt/2T7aUZ2
via cheap web hosting